After the conference, authors of accepted papers who have registered can submit their full paper for publication in the Conference Proceedings. Detailed instructions and submission guidelines will be emailed within a few weeks following the conference.

We accept the submission of high-quality papers describing original and unpublished results of conceptual, constructive, experimental, and theoretical work or research in all of the topic areas mentioned. Submission of a manuscript implies that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

All manuscripts will be subjected to double blind peer-review and are expected to meet the scientific criteria of novelty and academic excellence. The submitting author is responsible for ensuring that the article’s publication has been approved by all other co-authors and takes responsibility for the paper during submission and peer review. The publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.

ll submissions to the 2026 International Conference on Life Sciences and Health Engineering undergo a rigorous peer review process designed to ensure the highest standards of academic quality and relevance. The review process for IC-LSHE 2026 is structured to provide constructive feedback to authors while maintaining fair and objective evaluation criteria that reflect the interdisciplinary nature of the conference.

The review process is conducted by an international panel of expert reviewers comprising leading researchers, academicians, and industry professionals from diverse backgrounds within life sciences and health engineering. Each submission is evaluated based on originality, scientific rigor, methodological soundness, significance of findings, and relevance to the conference themes. Reviewers assess whether the work contributes meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge in its respective field and whether the presentation is clear, well-organized, and accessible to the target audience.

Review Timeline:

Upon submission, papers undergo an initial administrative screening to ensure compliance with formatting guidelines and scope relevance. Manuscripts that meet the basic requirements are then assigned to at least two independent reviewers who evaluate the content using a standardized evaluation rubric. Authors can expect to receive notification of acceptance within 10 to 40 working days following submission, depending on the session and review complexity. Review comments and feedback are provided to authors to facilitate improvement of their work prior to presentation.

Review Criteria:

Submissions are evaluated according to the following criteria: originality and innovation in research approach or findings; technical quality and methodological rigor; clarity and coherence of presentation; relevance to the selected session theme and the broader conference scope; and potential impact on the advancement of life sciences and health engineering. Papers demonstrating exceptional quality may be selected for recognition awards or invited for extended publication opportunities in partner journals.

Ethical Standards:

IC-LSHE 2026 is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. All reviewers are required to declare potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from reviews where such conflicts exist. Plagiarism detection software is employed to verify the originality of all submissions. Authors are expected to adhere to established ethical guidelines for human subjects research, animal welfare standards, and data integrity requirements.

1. Language
The conference considers articles in English.
2. Length of Paper
The conferencel does not impose strict limits on word count or page number. However, we strongly recommend that you write the article concisely.

Word Processing Format

The manuscript file should be provided in Microsoft Word format only.

Organization of Manuscript

There is a generally accepted and widely followed structure for a standard research article in academic conferences. While variations can occur based on the type of article (e.g., original research, book review, review article, discussion note, case study) and the specific guidelines of a particular journal, the following structure is commonly used:

1- Title
2- List of authors, their affiliations and email addresses
3- Keywords
4- Abstract
5- Introduction
6- Literature review
7- Methodology
8- Results/Findings
9- Conclusion
10- Statements and Declarations
11- References

1. Title
The title should be a concise and informative description of the work that accurately reflects the main scope and content of the paper. It should be no more than 12 words in length. Abbreviations and formulas should be avoided where possible.
2. Author Information
(a) The name(s) of the author(s)
(b) The affiliation(s) of the author(s), i.e. institution, (department), city, (state), country
(c) A clear indication and an active e-mail address of the corresponding author
(d) If available, the 16-digit ORCID of the author(s)
If the address information is provided with the affiliation(s) it will also be published.
For authors that are (temporarily) unaffiliated we will only capture their city and country of residence, not their e-mail address unless specifically requested.
3. Abstract
The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, design/methodology/approach, the main results and major conclusions. It should not exceed 350 words. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references.
4. Keywords
The author should provide 4 to 6 keywords which can be used for indexing purposes.
5. Introduction
This section should be concise and define the background and significance of the research by considering the relevant literature, particularly the most recent publications. When preparing the introduction, please bear in mind that some readers will not be experts in your field of research.
6. Literature Review
This section is dedicated to the significant literature resources that contributed to the research. The author should survey scholarly articles, books and other sources relevant to the area of research, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work.
7. Methodology
This section should contain detailed information about the procedures and steps followed in the study. It can be divided into subsections if several methods are described.
8. Results/Findings
This section is a comparative or descriptive analysis of the study based on the results/findings, previous literature, etc. The results should be offered in a logical sequence, given the most important findings first and addressing the stated objectives of the study. The author should deal only with new or important aspects of the results obtained. The relevance of the findings in the context of existing literature or contemporary practice should be addressed as well.
9. Conclusion
The author should clearly explain the important conclusions of the research highlighting their significance and relevance.
10. Statements and Declarations
(a) Funding: Please add: “This research received no external funding” or “This research was funded by name of funder, grant number XXX” and “The APC was funded by XXX”.
(b) Conflicts of Interest: Declare conflicts of interest or state “The authors declare no conflict of interest.”
(c) Acknowledgments: Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc. can be mentioned. The names of funding organizations should be written in full.
11. References
References must be relevant and up-to-date. References used in the paper should follow the APA style and be carefully checked for accuracy and consistency. Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list and vice versa.